Complex migrations, integrations, and hands-on Business Central development — as white-label technical capacity for BC implementation partners, or engaged directly by companies who want that same expertise without going through an intermediary.
Viewing content for Business Central implementation partners looking for white-label technical capacity.
Multi-entity consolidations with historical ledger preservation tie up senior developers for months — or get deferred until they become a crisis.
Migrations from custom ERPs, AS400, Sage, QuickBooks, or homegrown ODBC systems require depth most teams don't keep on staff full-time.
Integration projects requiring .NET, Azure Functions, and REST API architecture fall outside the AL-only skill set of most BC developers.
Emergency escalations — performance issues, costing failures, data integrity problems — need someone who can move at the database level immediately.
A finance degree combined with 10+ years of BC development means I can engage directly with CFOs and controllers on costing, ledger integrity, and audit requirements — not just the development team.
A production-tested suite of reusable frameworks: an integration engine, SQL migration tooling, NAV-to-BC upgrade tools, and a logging layer — built across real engagements, not assembled for a pitch.
I don't pursue managed services contracts or compete for your clients. I'm technical capacity. Ongoing support relationships stay with you. Referrals go back to you.
Production-tested frameworks developed and refined across multiple client engagements. Engagements that draw on them move faster and require less remediation.
Reusable integration framework for connecting BC to third-party platforms. Authentication, transformation, error handling, and retry logic as shared infrastructure — not rebuilt per engagement.
SQL-based migration tooling handling extraction from any ODBC/OLE source, entry number renumbering, collision resolution across entities, and full sub-ledger preservation.
Purpose-built for NAV-to-BC migrations — object analysis, C/AL to AL conversion assistance, and validation frameworks for moving legacy codebases through the transition.
Custom logging and observability framework for BC. Structured event capture, error tracing, and audit trail support beyond what native BC telemetry exposes.
Core SQL connectivity library and search tooling for BC. Direct data-layer access patterns for migration, reporting, and integration work where standard AL table access is insufficient.
Full AL-Go pipeline setup covering multi-environment CI/CD, artifact signing, AppSource delivery targets with version and go-live controls, ALDoc documentation generation, and concurrency-safe deployment — including the separate migration app pattern that keeps AppSource packages clean.
PE-backed client acquiring multiple companies — needs consolidated financials with clean audit trails and historical ledger preservation across entities with entry number conflicts.
NAV-to-BC migration with a large legacy C/AL codebase — needs object-by-object analysis, conversion strategy, and validation before cutover.
Complex legacy ERP migration from a custom or homegrown system with no existing NAV/GP pathway and non-standard data schema.
Integration project requiring .NET, Azure Functions, or REST API depth — or one where the same integration pattern needs to be reused across multiple clients.
Performance emergency or costing failure requiring database-level investigation on short notice — a client is down and needs resolution today.
Architecture review of work delivered by another developer — validating that what was built will hold up under client load, financial audit, and long-term maintainability standards.
No. I don't pursue managed services contracts or ongoing client relationships. I'm technical capacity for the specialized work — support relationships and referrals stay with you.
Yes — white-label is one of four relationship structures I work under, alongside co-delivery, subcontractor, and referral. Which one fits depends on how visible you want me to be to the client.
Time & materials (billed through you or direct), a deferred retainer, timeboxed blocks, or project-based pricing with defined scope — see Engagement Models above for the full breakdown.
I keep short-notice and emergency slots open. Typical response is within 24 hours, with engagement starting within 1–2 days.
Any ODBC/OLE source — NAV, GP, Sage, QuickBooks, AS400, or a homegrown ERP — migrating into Business Central, including on-premises to SaaS.
Yes — AL-Go and GitHub Actions pipelines, artifact signing, and AppSource delivery targets are all part of the standard tooling. I can also help set that up if it isn't in place yet.
Email with your scenario and timeline. I'll respond within 24 hours with a direct answer on whether I can help and how.
zroberts@cimarron-tech.comI don't pursue managed services contracts or ongoing client relationships. Work you refer stays yours.
Multi-entity consolidations after an acquisition tie up your internal team for months — or get pushed to "someday" until they become a crisis.
Migrating off a legacy system — AS400, Sage, QuickBooks, or a homegrown ERP — requires data-migration depth most internal teams don't keep on staff.
Integration projects requiring .NET, Azure Functions, and REST API architecture fall outside what a typical in-house AL developer or VAR can staff full-time.
Emergency escalations — performance issues, costing failures, data integrity problems — need someone who can move at the database level today, not next sprint.
A finance degree combined with 10+ years of BC development means I can talk directly with your CFO or controller about costing, ledger integrity, and audit requirements — not just hand a ticket to a developer.
A production-tested suite of reusable frameworks: an integration engine, SQL migration tooling, NAV-to-BC upgrade tools, and a logging layer — built across real engagements, so your project moves faster and costs less.
If you already have a BC partner or in-house team, I plug in for the specialized piece and hand back cleanly. I'm not trying to become your everyday support desk or replace that relationship.
Production-tested frameworks developed and refined across multiple engagements — for partners and direct clients alike. Projects that draw on them move faster and require less remediation.
Reusable integration framework for connecting BC to third-party platforms. Authentication, transformation, error handling, and retry logic as shared infrastructure — not rebuilt from scratch for your project.
SQL-based migration tooling handling extraction from any ODBC/OLE source, entry number renumbering, collision resolution across entities, and full sub-ledger preservation.
Purpose-built for NAV-to-BC migrations — object analysis, C/AL to AL conversion assistance, and validation frameworks for moving your legacy codebase through the transition.
Custom logging and observability framework for BC. Structured event capture, error tracing, and audit trail support beyond what native BC telemetry exposes.
Core SQL connectivity library and search tooling for BC. Direct data-layer access patterns for migration, reporting, and integration work where standard AL table access is insufficient.
Full AL-Go pipeline setup covering multi-environment CI/CD, artifact signing, AppSource delivery targets with version and go-live controls, ALDoc documentation generation, and concurrency-safe deployment.
You've acquired another company and need consolidated financials with clean audit trails and historical ledger preservation across entities with entry number conflicts.
You're migrating off a legacy system — AS400, Sage, QuickBooks, or a homegrown ERP — with no clear path forward and no in-house migration expertise.
An integration project needs .NET, Azure Functions, or REST API depth that your internal team or current partner doesn't have bandwidth for.
You're between BC partners — or your current one doesn't have the specialized bandwidth — and need a technical resource who can start on short notice.
A performance emergency or costing failure needs database-level investigation today — production is down and it's costing you money.
You want an independent architecture review of work delivered by an in-house developer or outside firm — before go-live, or as a health check.
Yes. I typically scope in for the specific piece — a migration, an integration, an emergency fix — and hand back cleanly. I'm not trying to replace that relationship.
Both. If you don't have ongoing BC support in place, retainer and embedded-capacity arrangements are available directly. If you do, I'm happy to stay in the specialized lane.
Time & materials, a fixed-fee project, timeboxed blocks, or a monthly retainer — whichever fits the work. Email your scenario and timeline for a direct answer on structure and cost.
I keep short-notice and emergency slots open. Typical response is within 24 hours, with engagement starting within 1–2 days.
No — the migration tooling extracts from any ODBC/OLE source, not just NAV or GP. Custom and homegrown ERPs are common starting points.
Yes — an independent architecture or code review is available on its own, with no build work attached, either before go-live or as a health check.
Email with your situation and timeline. I'll respond within 24 hours with a direct answer on whether I can help and how.
zroberts@cimarron-tech.comAlready working with a BC partner or in-house team? I can plug in for the specialized piece without stepping on that relationship.